Democrats Unite Behind Voting Rights Invoice as It Faces a Senate Roadblock

0
78

WASHINGTON – A Democratic push to pass the largest voting bill in generations is set to collapse in the Senate Tuesday, when Republicans are expected to use a filibuster to block a move President Biden and his allies in Congress said is vital have step to protect democracy.

Despite solid Republican opposition, Democrats plan to escalate the Senate voting battle by convening a test vote to try to push ahead with the major overhaul of the federal elections known as the For the People Act. As Republican-led states rush to enact restrictive new electoral laws, the Democrats have portrayed the law as the party’s best chance to reverse it, expand access to voting from coast to coast, and reduce the impact of special interests limit the political process.

“We can argue what should be done to protect the franchise and protect our democracy, but don’t you think we should be able to discuss the matter?” Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and majority leader, said on Monday in a final appeal to Republicans to continue the debate.

But in the hours leading up to the vote, Democrats admitted they were facing defeat – at least for now. Even if they managed to win the votes of all 50 senators in the Democratic faction, it was expected that party leaders would be well below the 60 votes required to overcome a filibuster and start debating the bill .

Instead, on Monday they focused on rallying the party around a more limited alternative, that of Senator Joe Manchin III. Both the White House and former President Barack Obama said his proposals would address many of the most pressing issues.

Heads of State and Government hope that, given the support of his proposal, Mr Manchin will vote with the rest of the Democrats and Senate Democrat-minded independents to continue the debate so that his party can present a unified front on the bill.

“What we are measuring, I think, is that the Democratic Party is united? We weren’t a couple of weeks ago, “said Jen Psaki, White House press secretary, before admitting the vote would fail.

Mr Obama offered tepid approval, saying that he would address many of his concerns about the election but “does not have everything I would want in a proxy bill”.

Regardless, Schumer seemed to have only one remaining option to try to get the bill passed: to abolish or change the Senate rule that sets a 60-vote threshold for breaking a filibuster of the law. Progressives have been calling for this since the Democrats won a slim majority in January, arguing ahead of Tuesday’s vote that it would help advance their point. But a handful of important moderates, led by Mr. Manchin, insist that they will never go along.

With the road ahead so bleak, top Democrats began to label Tuesday’s vote a moral victory and possibly a crucial step in building consensus on the eventual demolition of the filibuster.

The result, Ms. Psaki said, “may change the conversation on the hill” about the filibuster, but she did not offer any clear next steps.

Mr Manchin had opposed himself in the original For the People Act for interfering too much with states’ rights to regulate their own elections. His proposal would remove a provision neutering state voter identification laws and abolishing a public campaign funding program.

But it maintains other important measures, such as ending partisan gerrymandering of Congressional districts and creating tough new ethical rules. It would also expand early voting, make election day a federal holiday, and make postal voting easier.

A Monmouth University poll released Monday showed that Mr Manchin’s position may be more in line with public opinion, particularly his support for some types of voter identification requirements.

The struggle for the right to vote

After former President Donald J. Trump made false claims over the past few months that the 2020 elections were stolen from him, Republican lawmakers in many states have moved forward to pass laws that make voting harder and how elections are conducted, which changes what Democrats and Democrats even frustrated some election officials in their own party.

    • A central theme: The rules and procedures of elections have become central to American politics. According to the research institute Brennan Center for Justice, the legislature had passed 22 new laws in 14 states by May 14, in order to make the voting process more difficult.
    • The basic measures: Restrictions vary by state, but may include restricting the use of ballot boxes, adding identification requirements for voters requesting postal ballot papers, and removing local laws that allow automatic registration for postal voting.
    • Other extreme measures: Some measures go beyond changing voting behavior, including adjusting electoral college and judicial voting rules, cracking down on citizen-led electoral initiatives, and banning private donations that provide resources to conduct elections.
    • Recoil: These Republican efforts have resulted in Democrats in Congress finding a way to pass federal voting laws. A major voting bill was passed in the House of Representatives in March, but it has faced difficult obstacles in the Senate, including from Joe Manchin III, Democrat of West Virginia. Republicans have remained closed to the proposal, and even if the bill went into effect, it would most likely face major legal challenges.
    • Florida: Measures here include restricting the use of mailboxes, introducing additional identification requirements for postal ballot papers, requiring voters to request a postal vote at every election, restricting who can pick up and dropping ballots, and further empowering partisan observers during the vote counting process.
    • Texas: The Texas Democrats successfully blocked the state’s extensive voting law known as SB 7 in a nightly strike and launched a large nationwide registration program that focuses on racially diverse communities. But the state’s Republicans have promised to return in a special session and pass a similar voting bill. SB 7 includes new postal voting restrictions; granted the party election observers a broad new autonomy and authority; escalated penalties for mistakes or offenses by election officials; and banned both drive-through voting and 24-hour voting.
    • Other states: Arizona’s Republican-controlled legislature passed a law that would restrict the distribution of postal ballots. The bill, which provides for voters to be removed from the state’s standing pre-election list if they do not cast a vote at least every two years, may be just the first in a series of voting restrictions enacted there. Georgia Republicans passed sweeping new electoral laws in March that restrict ballot boxes and make the distribution of water within certain boundaries of a polling station a misdemeanor. And Iowa has imposed new restrictions, including shortening the deadline for early voting and voting in person on election day.

For example, the survey found that seven out of ten Americans were in favor of facilitating early face-to-face voting and for the federal government to establish national guidelines for mail-in and early face-to-face voting. But eight in ten said they generally supported the requirements for identifying voters who the For the People Act would effectively castrate.

Other Democratic Senators have joined Mr. Manchin to oppose the end of the filibuster. Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona has been the most outspoken, but other lawmakers, such as Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire and Jon Tester of Montana, have expressed reluctance to repeal the rule.

Republicans agree in their opposition to both the original Democratic bill and Mr Manchin’s amendments. They describe them as too prescriptive and geared towards giving their own party an advantage in future elections.

“The real driving force behind p. 1 is a desire to permanently – permanently – rig the rules of the American election in favor of the Democrats,” said Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and minority leader, referring to the bill by law number . “That is why the Senate will not leave room for this disastrous proposal.”

Reid J. Epstein and Catie Edmondson contributed to the coverage.